A risk neutral person
– is only interested in whether the odds will yield
a profit on average
A risk-averse person
– will refuse a fair gamble
i.e. one which on average will make exactly zero
monetary profit
A risk-lover
– will bet even when a strict mathematical
calculation reveals that the odds are
unfavourable
21 trang |
Chia sẻ: haohao89 | Lượt xem: 2002 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Coping with risk in economic life, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Chapter 15
Coping with risk in economic life
David Begg, Stanley Fischer and Rudiger Dornbusch, Economics,
6th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2000
Power Point presentation by Peter Smith
15.1
Individual attitudes towards risk
A risk neutral person
– is only interested in whether the odds will yield
a profit on average
A risk-averse person
– will refuse a fair gamble
i.e. one which on average will make exactly zero
monetary profit
A risk-lover
– will bet even when a strict mathematical
calculation reveals that the odds are
unfavourable
15.2
Risk and insurance
Risk-pooling
– works by aggregating independent risks to
make the aggregate more certain
Risk-sharing
– works by reducing the stake
By pooling and sharing risks, insurance
allows individuals to deal with many risks
at affordable premiums.
15.3
Moral hazard and adverse selection
Moral hazard
– is the exploiting of inside information to take
advantage of the other party to a contract
e.g. if you take less care of your property
because you know it is insured
Adverse selection
– occurs when individuals use their inside
information to accept or reject a contract, so
that those who accept are not an average
sample of the population
e.g. smokers taking out life insurance
15.4
Portfolio selection
The risk-averse consumer prefers a higher
average return on a portfolio of assets
– but dislikes risk.
Diversification
– is a strategy of reducing risk by risk-pooling
across several assets whose individual returns
behave differently from one another.
Beta
– is a measurement of the extent to which a
particular share's return moves with the return
on the whole stock market
15.5
Efficient asset markets
The theory of efficient markets
– says that the stock market is a sensitive
processor of information
– quickly responding to new information
to adjust share prices correctly
An efficient asset market already
incorporates existing information
properly in asset prices.
15.6
More on risk
A spot market
– deals in contracts for immediate delivery and payment
A forward market
– deals in contracts made today for delivery of goods at a
specified future date at a price agreed today
Hedging
– the use of forward markets to shift risk on to somebody
else.
A speculator
– temporarily holds an asset in the hope of making a
capital gain.
15.7
Chapter 16
Introduction to welfare economics
David Begg, Stanley Fischer and Rudiger Dornbusch, Economics,
6th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2000
Power Point presentation by Peter Smith
16.9
Welfare economics
The branch of economics
dealing with normative issues.
Its purpose is not to describe
how the economy works
but to assess how well it works.
16.10
Equity and efficiency
Horizontal equity
– the identical treatment of identical
people
Vertical equity
– the different treatment of different
people in order to reduce the
consequences of their innate
differences
16.11
Pareto efficiency
An allocation is Pareto-efficient for a
given set of consumer tastes,
resources and technology, if it is
impossible to move to another
allocation which would make some
people better off and nobody worse
off.
16.12
Perfect competition and Pareto efficiency
If every market in the economy is a
perfectly competitive free market, the
resulting equilibrium throughout the
economy will be Pareto-efficient.
As expressed in Adam Smith’s
notion of the Invisible Hand.
16.13
Competitive equilibrium and
Pareto-efficiency
At any output such as Q1*,
the last film must yield
consumers P1* extra utility.
The supply curve for the
competitive film industry
(SS) is the marginal cost of
films.
Away from P1*, Q1*, there
is a divergence between
the marginal cost and the
marginal benefit derived
by consumers
so a move to that position
makes society better off.
D
SSD
Q1*
P1*
Quantity of films
16.14
Distortions
A distortion exists whenever society’s
marginal cost of producing a good does
not equal society’s marginal benefit from
consuming that good.
– Some such distortions may be inevitable
– and it may be more efficient to spread such
distortion over a wide range of markets, rather
than concentrating it in one market
– this results from the theory of the second-best
16.15
Market failure
… occurs when equilibrium in free
unregulated markets will fail to
achieve an efficient allocation.
Imperfect competition
Social priorities (e.g. equity)
Externalities
Other missing markets
– future goods, risk, information.
16.16
Externalities
An externality arises whenever an
individual’s production or
consumption decision directly
affects the production or
consumption of others…
other than through market prices
e.g. a chemical firm discharges waste
into a lake & ruins the fishing for
anglers
16.17
A production externality
Quantity
DD
Suppose DD represents
the demand curve for a
product (which we may
interpret as marginal
social benefit).
MPC
MPC is the marginal
private cost incurred by
the firm in producing
the good (assumed
constant for simplicity).
P
Q
The market clears where
MPC=DD at price P and
quantity Q.
16.18
A production externality
Quantity
DD
(MSB)
MPC
Q
MSC
If the firm causes pollution,
it imposes costs on society,
presented by marginal
social costs (MSC).
Q*
So the social optimum is
where DD(MSB)=MSC at Q*.
The overall welfare
loss to society from
the market failure is
given by the excess
of MSC over MPC
between Q* and Q.
16.19
A consumption externality
DD
MPC,
MSC
Quantity
P
ri
c
e
Q
A consumption externality
may cause marginal social
benefit to diverge from
marginal private benefit.
If MSB>MPB, then the
free market equilibrium
provides the quantity Q.
MSB
Q'
As compared with the
social optimum at Q',
where MSB = MSC.
The red area shows the
welfare loss.
E.g. neighbours may benefit from a well-kept garden.
16.20
Greenhouse gases 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Index (1990 =
100)
Ja
pa
n
US
A
Ge
rm
an
y UK Ita
ly
Emission of greenhouse gases
1990
1995
2012