The fruit industry in Vietnam has a great potential and plays an important role in
agricultural production. In 2003, Vietnam exported US$43 million of high value fruit to
high-income countries and imported US$14 million of fruit and vegetables. Vietnam is
experiencing difficulties in competing with other Asian nations in export markets and its
own domestic market, especially with China and Thailand. This suggests that Vietnam’s
horticultural industries require substantial development to be globally competitive.
Vietnamese consumers are demanding safer and higher quality fruit. This project has
identified key pre-and post-harvest technologygaps that reduce product quality, safety
and consistency. Targeted training programs are focusing on the total supply chain and are
providing benefits by helping to implement quality management systems and GAP
systems at the village level providing greater employment for the farming community.
This project embraces the five CARD strategies for rural development; and in particular;
strategies to increase production and competitiveness of agricultural systems; reduce
poverty and vulnerability, and increase stakeholder participation whilst ensuring
sustainability.
21 trang |
Chia sẻ: ttlbattu | Lượt xem: 1816 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Đề tài Improvement of export and domestic markets for Vietnamese fruit through improved post-Harvest and supply chain management - MS3, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development
CARD Project Progress Report
050/04VIE
Improvement of export and domestic markets for
Vietnamese fruit through improved post-harvest
and supply chain management
MS3: SECOND SIX MONTHLY REPORT
June 2006
1
1. Institute Information
Project Name Improvement of export and domestic markets for
Vietnamese fruit through improved post-harvest and
supply chain management.
Vietnamese Institution Southern Sub-Institute of Agricultural Engineering and
Post-Harvest Technology (SIAEP)
Vietnamese Project Team Leader Mr Nguyen Duy Duc, M. Eng.
Australian Organisation Queensland Department of Primary Industries and
Fisheries (DPI & F)
Australian Personnel Mr. Robert Nissen; Dr. Peter Hofman
Mr Brett Tucker; Mr. Roland Holmes; Mss Marlo
Rankin
Date commenced June 2005
Completion date (original) May 2008
Completion date (revised) June 2008
Reporting period Progress Report 1st Year June 2006
Contact Officer(s)
In Australia: Team Leader
Name: Mr. Robert Nissen Telephone: +61 07 54449631
Position: Project Leader Fax: +61 07 54412235
Organisation Queensland Department
of Primary Industries
and Fisheries (DPI & F)
Email: bob.nissen@dpi.qld.gov.au
In Australia: Administrative contact
Name: Michelle Robbins Telephone: +61 07 3346 2711
Position: Senior Planning
Officer (Emerging
Technologies)
Fax: +61 07 3346 2727
Organisation Queensland
Department of
Primary Industries
and Fisheries (DPI
& F)
Email: michelle.robbins@dpi.qld.gov.au
In Vietnam
Name: Mr Nguyen Duy Duc, Telephone: +84 (8) 8481151
Position: Director SIAEP Fax: +84 (8) 8438842
2
Organisation Southern Sub-Institute of
Agricultural Engineering and
Post-Harvest Technology
(SIAEP)
Email: siaep@hcm.vnn.vn
3
2. Project Abstract
The fruit industry in Vietnam has a great potential and plays an important role in
agricultural production. In 2003, Vietnam exported US$43 million of high value fruit to
high-income countries and imported US$14 million of fruit and vegetables. Vietnam is
experiencing difficulties in competing with other Asian nations in export markets and its
own domestic market, especially with China and Thailand. This suggests that Vietnam’s
horticultural industries require substantial development to be globally competitive.
Vietnamese consumers are demanding safer and higher quality fruit. This project has
identified key pre-and post-harvest technology gaps that reduce product quality, safety
and consistency. Targeted training programs are focusing on the total supply chain and are
providing benefits by helping to implement quality management systems and GAP
systems at the village level providing greater employment for the farming community.
This project embraces the five CARD strategies for rural development; and in particular;
strategies to increase production and competitiveness of agricultural systems; reduce
poverty and vulnerability, and increase stakeholder participation whilst ensuring
sustainability.
3. Executive Summary
Baseline surveys were conducted for mango in Tien Gien and Khanh Hoa Provinces
and for pomelo in the Vinh Long Province. In total, over 120 farmers, 30 collectors
and 20 wholesalers were interviewed by the Vietnamese collaborators to obtain vital
information on how the mango and pomelo supply chians are operating.
Initial fact finding and surveys indicate that GAP, IPM and IDM issues are the largest
issues affecting fruit quality in both mango and pomelo supply chains. GAP manuals
are being developed based on current, and newly developed Asian Good Agricultural
Practice (GAP) principles. Initial drafts of manuals have been completed for Mango
Cultivation Handbook, Mango Pest Control Handbook, Mango Disease Handbook
and Pomelo Cultivation, Pest and Disease Control Handbook, and further
development of manuals is being undertaken. Post-harvest handbook for mango is
being developed in collaboration with SIAEP and SOFRI staff.
Workshops have been conducted using participatory action learning processes to
enhance the knowledge of SIAEP and SOFRI staff. Workshops were conducted on:
• developing supply chain maps on product movement, information and
monetary flows
• understanding of how supply chains function
• a strengths, weakness, opportunity and threats (SWOT) analysis
• a supply chain process analysis, that identified problems and solutions for
mango and pomelo supply chains
• developing strategic and action plans for mango and pomelo supply chains
Workshops were also held in villages with mango and pomelo growers and with
collectors to discuss supply chain maps, the SWOT analyses and strategic plans. This
4
enabled adjustment to the plans developed at earlier workshops, and to obtain support
and input from a wider cross section of farmer/growers. Information from all of these
sources was then used to develop the final industry mission statements, strategic and
actions plans. These plans were found to be in line with objectives of this CARD
Project. These objectives will be implemented during this project.
The ORID system was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the workshops. Fifty
percent of the workshop participants understood workshop concepts very well, while
the remaining 50 percent said they were satisfied with their understanding of
workshop concepts. Eighty three percent of the group indicated they would be
confident in using these concepts with other supply chains and this training fulfilled
their expectations.
Benefits to grower/farmers involvement in the workshops and training exercises has
been shown through one group been stimulated into proactively addressing and
developing new and harvesting, handling and packaging systems which improved
their first grade pack out percentage by 10%, thus providing greater scio-economic
benefits to the village and the wider community.
4. Introduction & Background
Ford et al., (2003) analysed the competitiveness of fruit industries in Vietnam and
identified poor unstable product quality, no quality standards poor post harvest
technologies and pre-harvest practices, lack of group co-operative marketing
structures and little information about supply chains, prices and customers needs.
This project addresses serious constraints through identifying key Vietnamese
stakeholders from both government and industry sectors. It engages them and
empowers them by focusing on the total supply chain network, and identify where
benefits are to be gained.
Stakeholder/beneficiary analysis conducted at project scoping and development stage
showed that mango is an important fruit crop in the Mekong Delta (33 000 ha), and in
the Khanh Hoa central coastal province (9 200 ha). Pomelo is also important in the
Mekong Delta (9 000 ha). The objectives of the project are:
• Improved pre-harvest technologies to produce high quality mango
(integrated pest management, integrated crop management, fruit fly control,
maturity indices, reduced pesticide residues, better environmental and
human health etc)
• Improved mango and pomelo post-harvest technologies (eg cool chain
management, packaging, post-harvest dipping, ethylene ripening, waxing,
washing and wetting agents, quality assurance)
• Improved quality standards and quality assurance programs for mango and
pomelo. The approach and methodologies developed for these crops
through this project will be applied to other fruits and vegetables.
5
• Mapping of current supply chains to domestic and selected export markets,
with particular emphasis on determining consumer preferences and needs,
and reporting results back to farmers.
• Provide a better understanding and possible improvements of the supply
chain by Vietnamese fruit industries for mango and pomelo.
This project will fill capacity gaps and reduce major weaknesses in pre-and post-
harvest technologies affecting product quality consistency and supply chain
management and planning. Highly specialised targeted training programs appropriate
for institutions and industry stakeholders will be provided.
At the local village and district level, cluster development of farmer/grower groups
should ensure better on-farm prices, through increased power to these
farmers/growers benefiting all members of the supply chain farmers, intermediaries to
retailers rather than the present powers brokers in the chain. Farm incomes will
therefore increase and result in better standard of living for rural and women. In
addition, if quality management systems are implemented at the village and district
level, through more appropriate fruit quality standards, packaging and grading
systems implemented. The benefits may be increase returns resulting in greater
employment at the local village level. The flow on affects of this will benefit the poor
in the rural areas, and specifically help provide more jobs for rural women.
5. Progress to Date
Implementation Highlights
Baseline Surveys
Supply chain baseline surveys were conducted by SIEAP and SOFRI staff for mango
in Tien Gien and Khanh Hoa Provinces and for pomelo in the Vinh Long Province.
Mango and pomelo production for the relevant regions revealed:
• Mango
o South East Vietnam:- 18 685ha producing 70 622 tonnes annually
o Mekong Delta:- 22 001ha producing 193 383 tonnes annually
o Khanh Hoa Province:- 5 800ha producing 18 800 tonnes annually
• Pomelo
o South East Vietnam:- 1 422ha producing 12 932 tonnes annually
o Mekong Delta:- 8 298ha producing 108 916 tonnes annually
About 20% of Vietnam’s population live in the Mekong Delta Region with 85%
living in rural areas. About 80% of rural farms range in size from 0.5 to 2ha. The
lower poverty line defined by Vietnamese General Statistics Office (GSO) is;
expenditure per capita required for securing a minimum nutritional requirement (2100
calories per day). Therefore, the poverty rate below the lower limit calculated by the
(GSO) in 2003 showed that the total poverty percentage for each Vietnamese region
where this project is operating is:
• Mekong Delta 23.7%
6
• South Central Cost 25.9%
These percentages are lower than Vietnam’s average poverty rate of 28.85 percent.
The only other region to record a poverty rate below this is the Red River Delta region
(22.4%).
The rural poverty rates have the similar trends and are:
• Mekong Delta 26.56%
• South Central Cost 31.27%
In total, over 120 farmers, 30 collectors and 20 wholesalers were interviewed by the
Vietnamese collaborators to obtain vital information on how the supply chains for
mango and pomelo are functioning in Vietnam. Surveys will be conducted at the end
of the project for further comparisons.
Survey data was presented at the first workshop during the second project trip in
April-May 2006. Information obtained was then used in subsequent workshops to
develop models of the supply chains for mango pomelo operating in Vietnam and to
develop the strategic plans for mango and pomelo.
Brief Summary of Mango Baseline Survey Information
• Total Mango area and production for the South East is 18 685 ha producing 70
622 tonnes/year, Mekong Delta Region 22 001ha producing 193 383
tonnes/year and Khanh Hoa Province 5 800ha, producing 18 800 tonnes/year.
• Vietnamese consumers regard the “Cat Hoa Loc” as the number one variety in
Vietnam.
• In the Mekong Delta, about 72% of mango fruit are transported from farm to
collector by boat, but in Khanh Hoa Province 100% are via some form of road
transport. Farmers, collectors and wholesaler believe that only 1-2% of fruit is
damaged during transport in 30 to 50 kg bamboo baskets or crates.
• In the Mekong Delta a small percentage of mango is graded at the farm level
but most fruit are graded and sorted at the collector and then again at the
wholesaler level in the supply chain. In contrast, for Khanh Hoa Province,
about 54% of farmers grade their fruit.
• In the Mekong Delta there are three basic grades, Class 1:- 420-500g, Class 2:-
300-420g and Class 3:- <300g, whilst in Khanh Hoa there are also three
grades, Class 1:- 1-3 fruit/kg, Class 2:- 4-6 fruit/kg and Beer class >6 fruit /kg.
Fruit grading is carried out by eye. Improvement and standardisation of
quality standards as well as adoption by all participants in the supply chain is
need.
• Most fruit are sold hard green, ripe fruit are not wanted.
• Collectors/farmers prefer to sell mixed grades even though the farm gate price
will be low. This is done to allow collectors/farmers to sell Class 3 fruit which
they could not normally sell. On the other hand many wholesalers find it
extremely difficult to sell Class 3 fruit. This adds significant costs to all
aspects of the supply chain and affects farmers/grower returns.
7
• Selling price for fruit:- Majority of farmers obtain the price of fruit locally.
This is achieved by asking as many collectors, farmers and wholesalers as
possible at the district level for their price paid or received for fruit sold.
• Price is usually set and established with farmers on day of sale or the day
before and based on the market supply on any given day.
• Majority of farmers do not know the price of mango at the HCMC wholesale
market.
• Wholesalers reported that most fruit will keep for 4 days with out the use of
special storage facilities. Presently there are no storage facilities located the
HCMC wholesale markets for wholesalers to use).
• At the wholesaler point in the supply chain, once the fruit is mature, for each
day that it is not sold, traders will reduce the price by 500-10 000 vnd/kg.
Brief Summary of Critical Pomelo Baseline Survey Information
• In the Mekong Delta, the Vin Long Province is considered as the leading
growing region in Vietnam for Pomelo.
• Total area and production in the Southeast is 1 422ha, producing 12 932
tonnes/year and for the Mekong Delta Region 8 298ha producing 108 916
tonnes/year.
• The pomelo variety “Man Roi” is considered the number one variety in
Vietnam.
• There are as many as 2 to 4 grades/standards of fruit depending upon market
and time of season. Each class grade standard changes, based on early season
production, mid-season and late-season production. For example, local market
there are 2 classes/grade standards, Hoang Gia Company uses 3 classes or
grade standards and the wholesale market in HCMC 4 classes or grade
standards.
• In the Mekong Delta, about 62% pomelo fruit are transported from farm to
collector by boat, and 66% transported by road to HCMC and the remainder
by boat in 80 to 85kg bamboo baskets.
• Of the total production from Vin Long Province it is estimated 5% to 6% is for
local consumption. In 2004, Metro Cash and Carry marketed 145 tonnes of
pomelo fruit. Also in 2004, 50 tonnes of pomelo was exported to Germany.
In 2005, a 100 tonnes was exported to Germany and Russia and the price was
US FOB HCMC $590USD/tonne (about 9 200VND/kg).
The CARD Project team are currently completing analysis of the baseline survey data.
Following data analysis reports will be prepared and PowerPoint presentations will be
made to Vietnamese Collaborators (SIAEP & SOFRI) and to the mango and pomelo
farmers, collectors, transporters, traders and wholesalers.
GAP Manual Development
Initial drafts of manuals have been completed. These are Mango Cultivation
Handbook, Mango Pest Control Handbook, Mango Disease Control Handbook and
the Pomelo Cultivation Pest and Disease Control Handbook. Further development
will be undertaken on these manuals. Post-harvest handbook for mango is being
developed in collaboration with SIAEP and SOFRI staff.
8
These manuals are based on current, newly developed Asian Good Agricultural
Practice (GAP) principles and will include farmer achievable improvements. These
technical manuals are being designed to be easily broken down into extension
officer’s guides and farmer/grower flip book or pocket field guides for IPM, IDM and
problem solving for the growing mango and pomelo.
Manual development and format will have the capacity to be regularly updated and
maintained. This will provide a system as farmer/grower GAP practices and
knowledge improves, they can move up to the next GAP level or step up to the next
knowledge level.
Initial fact finding and surveys indicate that GAP, IPM and IDM issues are the most
important factors affecting fruit quality in both mango and pomelo supply chains. It is
essential that these elements be corrected first before any substantial change can be
achieved though the supply chain. Participants downstream along the supply chain
cannot enhance fruit quality only maintain it with good practices and the saying
“garbage in garbage out’ is typical of any supply chain with poor quality fruit entering
the chain.
Integrated pest management (IPM) and biological control methods have been well
established in many developed countries. However, increased consumer demand for
'clean and green' products, greater understanding of occupational health and safety on
farms, and ecological and environmental issues and higher chemical costs have all
combined to highlight the need for greater IPM and IDM type practices. Vietnamese
growers must develop practical IPM and IDM systems to suit their own industry
situations and implement them to be international and domestically competitive as
well as scio-economically and environmentally sustainable.
Mango and Pomelo Industry Development
Three Australian team members travelled to Vietnam in April-May 2006 to conduct
capacity building exercises and run a series of 6 workshops. These workshops used
participatory action learning processes and capacity building for SIAEP and SOFRI
staff to develop:
• supply chain maps
• conduct a strengths, weakness, opportunity and threats (SWOT) analyse
• carry out a supply chain process analysis
• develop strategic plans for mango and pomelo supply chains for participating
CARD project members.
CARD Project members participating in these workshops were SIAEP and SOFRI
staff, farmers, collectors, traders, wholesalers and marketers etc., (see Appendix B).
All were involved in a participatory action learning process to develop the supply
chain maps, carry out SOWT analyses, develop strategic plans and participate in the
supply chain process analyse. See Appendix A for supply chain maps and SWOT
analyse.
Workshops were also held in villages with mango and pomelo growers (see Appendix
B) and with collectors to discuss supply chain maps, the SWOT analyse and strategic
plans developed at previous workshops and to adjust and obtain input from a wider
9
cross section of farmer/growers. This consultative and participatory action learning
approach is designed to empower the rural poor in the decision making processes.
Based on the agreed vision, goals and future direction for both the mango and pomelo
CARD project participants developed action plans based on the strategic plans. These
action plans for both the mango and pomelo supply chains aligned with this CARD
Project objectives. Therefore, the action plans developed indicate the project
activities for the next 2 years. Also outlined, are the reports and manuals to be
produce. These action plans, reports and manuals were discussed at the final
workshop during the Australian team visit in April-May 2006 (see Appendix C).
Strategic Planning for Mango and Pomelo Industries
Industry Mission Statements
Mango
Maintain stable incomes (prices) and consistent access to good markets by improving
pre-and post-harvest practices, QA s