The fruit industry in Vietnamhas a great potential and plays an important role in
agricultural production. In 2003, Vietnamexported US$43 million of high value fruit to
high-incomecountriesand imported US$14 million of fruit and vegetables. Vietnamis
experiencingdifficulties in competing with other Asian nations in export markets and its
own domestic market, especially with China and Thailand. This suggests that Vietnam’s
horticultural industriesrequire substantial development to be globally competitive.
Vietnamese consumers are demanding safer and higher quality fruit. This project has
identified key pre-and post-harvest technologygaps that reduce product quality, safety
and consistency. Targeted training programs are focusing on the total supply chain andare
providing benefits by helping to implement quality management systems and GAP
systems at the village level providing greater employment for the farming community.
This project embraces the five CARD strategies for rural development; and in particular;
strategies toincrease production and competitiveness of agricultural systems; reduce
poverty and vulnerability,and increase stakeholder participationwhilst ensuring
sustainability.
26 trang |
Chia sẻ: ttlbattu | Lượt xem: 1881 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Đề tài Improvement of export and domestic markets for Vietnamese fruit through improved post-Harvest and supply chain management - MS6, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development
CARD Project Progress Report
050/04VIE
Improvement of export and domestic
markets for Vietnamese fruit
through improved post-harvest and
supply chain management
MS6: FOURTH SIX MONTHLY REPORT
July 2007
1
Table of Contents
1. Institute Information ....................................................................................................... 1
2. Project Abstract ................................................................................................................ 3
3. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 3
4. Introduction & Background ............................................................................................ 5
5. Progress to Date ............................................................................................................... 6
Implementation Highlights ..............................................................................................................6
Smallholder Benefits.......................................................................................................................12
Capacity Building ...........................................................................................................................13
Publicity...........................................................................................................................................14
Project Management ......................................................................................................................15
6. Report on Cross-Cutting Issues..................................................................................... 17
Environment ...................................................................................................................................17
Gender and Social Issues ...............................................................................................................19
7. Implementation & Sustainability Issues ....................................................................... 21
Issues and Constraints....................................................................................................................21
Options.............................................................................................................................................22
Sustainability...................................................................................................................................23
8. Next Critical Steps.......................................................................................................... 23
9. Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 24
10. Statutory Declaration......................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
1
1. Institute Information
Project Name Improvement of export and domestic
markets for Vietnamese fruit through
improved post-harvest and supply
chain management.
Vietnamese Institution Southern Sub-Institute of Agricultural
Engineering and Post-Harvest
Technology (SIAEP)
Vietnamese Project Team Leader Mr Nguyen Duy Duc, M. Eng.
Australian Organisation Queensland Department of Primary
Industries and Fisheries (DPI & F)
Australian Personnel Mr. Robert Nissen
Dr. Peter Hofman
Mr Brett Tucker
Mr. Roland Holmes
Ms Marlo Rankin
Date commenced June 2005
Completion date (original) May 2008
Completion date (revised) June 2008
Reporting period Progress Report 3 Six Monthly January
2007
Contact Officer(s)
In Australia: Team Leader
Name: Mr. Robert Nissen Telephone: +61 07 54449631
Position: Project Leader Fax: +61 07 54412235
Organisation Queensland Department of
Primary Industries and
Fisheries (DPI & F)
Email: bob.nissen@dpi.qld.gov.au
In Australia: Administrative contact
Name: Michelle Robbins Telephone: +61 07 3346 2711
Position: Senior Planning Officer
(Emerging Technologies)
Fax: +61 07 3346 2727
Organisation Queensland Department
of Primary Industries and
Email: michelle.robbins@dpi.qld.gov.au
1
Fisheries (DPI & F)
In Viet Nam
Name: Mr Nguyen Duy Duc, Telephone: +84 (8) 8481151
Position: Director SIAEP Fax: +84 (8) 8438842
Organisation Southern Sub-Institute of
Agricultural Engineering and Post-
Harvest Technology (SIAEP)
Email: siaep@hcm.vnn.vn
2
2. Project Abstract
The fruit industry in Vietnam has a great potential and plays an important role in
agricultural production. In 2003, Vietnam exported US$43 million of high value fruit to
high-income countries and imported US$14 million of fruit and vegetables. Vietnam is
experiencing difficulties in competing with other Asian nations in export markets and its
own domestic market, especially with China and Thailand. This suggests that Vietnam’s
horticultural industries require substantial development to be globally competitive.
Vietnamese consumers are demanding safer and higher quality fruit. This project has
identified key pre-and post-harvest technology gaps that reduce product quality, safety
and consistency. Targeted training programs are focusing on the total supply chain and are
providing benefits by helping to implement quality management systems and GAP
systems at the village level providing greater employment for the farming community.
This project embraces the five CARD strategies for rural development; and in particular;
strategies to increase production and competitiveness of agricultural systems; reduce
poverty and vulnerability, and increase stakeholder participation whilst ensuring
sustainability.
3. Executive Summary
Studies on mango and pomelo fruit quality characteristics have been carried out. Results will
help establish fruit quality characteristics that will be used to develop quality guides for the
marketing of mango and pomelo.
Quality monitoring surveys to establish fruit defects have been carried out on mango by
SOFRI staff. Fruit affected by sapburn ranged from 16% to 50% across 5 markets in Can
Tho city. Market surveys conducted by Mr. Nissen on mango fruit being sold in northern
Vietnam showed that fruit affected by Anthracnose was 34%, sapburn 52%, abrasion marks
21%, and pressure marks 30%, fruit fly 1% and fruit rots (stem end and other rots) 3% (See
report on Survey of Mango Fruit Offered for Sale in Northern Vietnam). Many fruit had
multiple defects severely affecting consumer acceptance and product saleability.
CARD Project training of SIAEP and SOFRI staff and material supplied has assisted SIAEP
in the delivery of training workshops for Metro in their joint project with GTZ and the
Ministry of Commerce in Vietnam. Materials supplied and training carried out by this
CARD project have assisted SIAEP staff in the ADB project and workshops to assist farmers
in developing new agricultural supply chains to supply Metro stores with produce that meet
their specifications, particularly on product quality and food safety. Training for of more
than 700 farmers has been completed by SIAEP staff. Workshop evaluations have
indicated that over 90% of farmers were very satisfied with material supplied and workshops
conducted.
The strategic plans developed as part of this CARD Project for mango and pomelo are being
implemented by SIAEP and SOFRI team members. Considerable progress has been made on
the top 5 priorities for both the Vietnamese mango and pomelo industries.
3
Top 5 Priorities for the Mango Strategic Plan:- Listing in Order of Importance for Mango
Industry
1. Improve production process (e.g. follow GAP)
2. Need to improve the linkages between farmers – traders – customers, scientists and
government also need to be involved
3. Need market information for export and domestic markets
4. Improve packing and storing procedures/Need technical support to improve storing,
packing and packaging material
5. Government to help with planning and development for specialised fruit growing area
Top 5 Priorities for the Pomelo Strategic Plan:- Listing in Order of Importance for Mango
Industry
1. Supporting techniques from seedling–farming-harvesting (Guidance for GAP)
2. Advice/counsel on standards/specifications of products
3. Intensively farming and programming production area
4. Training on IPM
5. Improving applicability of farming techniques and technologies of harvesting,
packing and transporting
Preliminary socio-economic farmer surveys on Xoai (Mango) cultivar “Cat Hoa Loc”
farmers in the Hoa Hung Commune, Cai Be District, Tien giang Province in the Mekong
Delta of Vietnam indicates that:-
• Growers with high levels of management practices and high input levels obtain a
profit of VND 15,105,000 per 1000m2, 2.1 times greater than growers with mid level
management practices and mid level inputs and 3.7 times greater than grower with
low level management practices and inputs.
• For a 1000m2 area of mango the average farmer input is VND 6,405,000.
• The average yield per 1000m2 is 960 kg.
• The unit cost per kg of “Cat Hoa Loc” mango is VND 7,600.
• Mangoes are mainly sold at local markets. It is recommended to improve income,
farmers should develop market opportunities in HCMC and northern Vietnam.
Preliminary surveys of Buoi (Pomelo) cultivar “Nan Roi” in the My Hoa Commune, Binh
Minh District, Vinh Long Province in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam indicates that:-
• Growers with high levels of management practices and high input levels obtain a
profit of VND 3,576,000 per 1000m2, 2.4 times greater than growers with mid level
management practices and mid level inputs and 3.9 times greater than grower with
low level management practices and inputs.
• For a 1000m2 area of pomelo the average farmer input is VND 3,244,000
• The average yield pre 1000m2 is 1,648 kg.
• The unit cost per kg for Buoi “Nam Roi” is VND 2,100.
• Pomelos are mainly sold at local markets. It is recommended that farmers to improve
income they should develop market opportunities in HCMC and northern Vietnam
and look at ways of direct selling to the consumer.
4
4. Introduction & Background
Fruit and Vegetable crops are highly lucrative compared to staple crops. Horticultural
produce has high value-added and income generation potential when compared to livestock
and grain production. Horticulture is highly attractive especially for small scale farmers, and
has a comparative advantage, particularly where land holdings are small, labour is abundant
and markets reasonable accessible (Weinberger and Lumpkin, 2006). This situation is
particularly true in Mekong Delta and Central South Cost Province of Khanh Hoa, Viet Nam.
Ford et al., (2003), suggested the competitiveness of Vietnamese fruit industries were failing
due to poor, unstable product quality, no quality standards, poor post harvest technologies
and pre-harvest practices, lack of group co-operative marketing structures and little
information about supply chains, prices and customers needs.
This project is addressing these constraints by engaging with key Vietnamese stakeholders
from research institutes (SIAEP and SOFRI) and local farmers in the mango and pomelo
industries in Southern Viet Nam. This project has taken account of the total supply chain
network and focused on where significant benefits are to be gained in the pre- harvest, post-
harvest and marketing sectors.
The objectives of the project are:
• Improved pre-harvest technologies to produce high quality mango (integrated pest
management, integrated crop management, fruit fly control, maturity indices,
reduced pesticide residues, better environmental and human health etc)
• Improved mango and pomelo post-harvest technologies (eg cool chain
management, packaging, post-harvest dipping, ethylene ripening, waxing, washing
and wetting agents, quality assurance)
• Improved quality standards and quality assurance programs for mango and pomelo.
The approach and methodologies developed for these crops through this project
will be applied to other fruits and vegetables.
• Mapping of current supply chains to domestic and selected export markets, with
particular emphasis on determining consumer preferences and needs, and reporting
results back to farmers.
• Provide a better understanding and possible improvements of the supply chain by
Viet Namese fruit industries for mango and pomelo.
This project will fill capacity gaps and reduce major weaknesses in pre-and post-harvest
technologies affecting product quality consistency and supply chain management and
planning. Highly specialised targeted training programs appropriate for institutions and
industry stakeholders will be provided.
At the local village and district level, cluster development of farmer/grower groups should
ensure better on-farm prices. This will increase power to these farmers which will benefit all
members of the supply chain (intermediaries to retailers) rather than the present powers
brokers in the chain. Farm incomes will therefore increase and result in better standard of
living for rural families. In addition, if quality management systems are implemented at the
village and district level through more appropriate fruit quality standards, packaging and
grading systems should increase returns resulting in greater employment at the local village
5
level. The flow on effects of this will benefit the poor in the rural areas, and specifically help
provide more jobs for rural women.
5. Progress to Date
Implementation Highlights
Implementation highlights of CARD Project activities
Since mapping and conducting the SWOT analysis of the mango and pomelo supply chains
considerable development has been made on developing new supply chains. Development of
the action plans and the setting of responsibilities for SIAEP and SOFRI staff and supply
chain participants have been carried out and substantial development into identifying key
fruit quality characteristics competed. Determining fruit quality levels acceptable to farmers,
collectors, wholesalers, traders and retailers for pomelo and mango were undertaken. These
activities align with the proposed project activities 3, 5 6 7, 8, and 11 and project milestones
4, 7 and 9.
For example, studies on pomelo cv. “Nam Roi” and “Da Xanh” have been carried out and
data collected on fruit quality characteristics. Market requirement characteristics reported on
include:
Fruit shape
• Skin Colour
• Weight
• General Appearance
• Number of seed
• Rind colour, thickness and easiness to peel
• Flesh firmness, colour, juiciness flavour and separation flesh sacks from the segment
locular wall.
Studies on fruit quality characteristics for mango cv. “Cat Hoa Loc” and “Cat Chu” to
develop market quality characteristics included:
• Fruit shape, size, appearance
• Skin colour
• Brix levels
• Damage and defects (sapburn, disease and pest, cuts punctures, abrasion marks etc.)
See Appendix B for summary of pomelo and mango quality characteristics to be used for the
quality manual guides for Vietnam’s pomelo and mango industries.
Studies on mango sapbrun undertaken by SOFRI staff showed that the percentage of mango
fruit affected by sapburn ranged from 16% to 50% with an average of 33% across 5 markets
in Can Tho city.
6
Table 1. Percentage of sapburn mango fruit observed at retail markets in Can
Tho City (main season 2005)
Retail market Sapburn mango fruit (%)
3/2 market 41,5
Xuân Khanh 16,7
An Nghiep 50,0
An Hoa 31,3
Cai Khe Trade Centre 27,1
Source: Tran Ngoc Suong et al. 2006. Study on pre-harvest cultivation techniques and post-
harvest treatments to improve fruit quality and to prolong post-harvest shelf-life of mango cv.
“Cat Hoa Loc” in Can Tho provinces.
Skin damage on mango, no matter how small has a significant effect on customer and
consumer acceptability. Practices especially in South Vietnam have a sever effect on mango
fruit quality and saleability. Skin damage caused by any of the following conditions:
• environmental conditions (rainfall, wind, high temperature causing sunburn)
• pre-harvest management practices (damage due to pest and disease sprays, abrasion
or wind rub marks, incorrect tree pruning and training etc.)
• post-harvest practices or transport and handling practices (during picking, grading,
sorting and packaging causing abrasion, cuts, pressure and puncture marks).
Fruit affected by anthracnose in the northern markets is common. Market surveys conducted
by Mr. Nissen on mango fruit being sold in northern Vietnam showed that fruit affected by
Anthracnose was 34%, sapburn 52%, abrasion marks 21%, and pressure marks 30%, fruit fly
1% and fruit rots (stem end and other rots) 3% (See report on Survey of Mango Fruit Offered
for Sale in Northern Vietnam). Many fruit had multiple defects severely affecting consumer
acceptance and product saleability.
The disease Anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloesporiodies) severely affects mango post-
harvest life and fruit quality. The fungus remains dormant on green fruit until it begins to
ripen. As the natural resistance of green fruit breaks down, the fungus can grow unchecked
unless post-harvest treatments to control the disease are applied.
Therefore training on mango post-harvest physiology was conducted by the Australian team
in July 2007. One demonstration conducted during this training showed the use of a mango
stem sap remover which eliminates fruit sapburn. The use of this product alone will have a
significant impact on fruit quality and post-harvest storage life of mango as it will also help
stop fruit being affected by Anthracnose. Post-harvest treatment with Sportak ® is also
recommended.
In Australia there are two main treatments available. A hot dip using carbendazim (Spin
flo®) or a dip or flood spray with prochloraz (Sportak®). Your choice of treatment depends
on the level of disease in the orchard and the incidence of the other major fungus, stem-end
rot. If stem-end rot is not a problem, you can treat with prochloraz alone; if it is a problem,
you will need to use a hot carbendazim dip.
Post-harvest treatment trials conducted a SOFRI on controlling Anthracnose have proven to
be highly successful (see Appendix B) but skin scalding and browning and los of water from
the fruit are evident.
7
For Vietnamese growers, adopting such practices will be difficult. Chemical costs,
implementation of correct chemical dipping rates and controlling the hot water temperatures
and treatment practices involve complex processes. In Australia, many mango growers still
have significant problems with hot water treatment of mangoes and therefore this practise is
left to a few professional operators who have equipment capable of achieving reliable results.
It is recommended for Vietnam that a dip with prochloraz (Sportak®) be implemented to
control Anthracnose as this procedure can be easily carried out at the farm level with training
on chemical usage and dipping procedures. Many Vietnamese growers are not capable of
carrying out hot water dipping treatments due to lack of equipment and specific knowledge to
achieve repeatable and reliable results. New high value markets need to be developed before
such practices can be implemented to justify costs of carrying out such practices at the farmer
level.
Development of new supply chains
CARD Project training of SIAEP and SOFRI staff and material supplied has assisted SIAEP
in the delivery of training workshops f