The fruit industry in Vietnamhas a great potential and plays an important role in
agricultural production. In 2003, Vietnamexported US$43 million of high value fruit to
high-incomecountriesand imported US$14 million of fruit and vegetables. Vietnamis
experiencingdifficulties in competing with other Asian nations in export markets and its
own domestic market, especially with China and Thailand. This suggests that Vietnam’s
horticultural industriesrequire substantial development to be globally competitive.
Vietnamese consumers are demanding safer and higher quality fruit. This project has
identified key pre-and post-harvest technologygaps that reduce product quality, safety
and consistency. Targeted training programs are focusing on the total supply chain andare
providing benefits by helping to implement quality management systems and GAP
systems at the village level, providing greater employmentfor the farming community.
This project embraces the five CARD strategies for rural development; and in particular;
strategies toincrease production and competitiveness of agricultural systems; reduce
poverty and vulnerability,and increase stakeholder participationwhilst ensuring
sustainability.
56 trang |
Chia sẻ: ttlbattu | Lượt xem: 1795 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Đề tài Improvement of export and domestic markets for Vietnamese fruit through improved post-Harvest and supply chain management - MS8, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Ministry of Agriculture & Rural Development
CARD Project Progress Report
050/04VIE: Improvement of export and domestic
markets for Vietnamese fruit through improved
post-harvest and supply chain management
MS8: FIFTH SIX MONTHLY REPORT
January 2008
1
Table of Contents
1. Institute Information ....................................................................................................... 1
2. Project Abstract ................................................................................................................ 3
3. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 3
4. Introduction & Background ............................................................................................ 4
5. Progress to Date ............................................................................................................... 5
Implementation Highlights ..............................................................................................................5
Smallholder Benefits.......................................................................................................................11
Capacity Building ...........................................................................................................................13
Publicity...........................................................................................................................................15
Project Management ......................................................................................................................16
6. Report on Cross-Cutting Issues..................................................................................... 17
Environment ...................................................................................................................................17
Gender and Social Issues ...............................................................................................................18
7. Implementation & Sustainability Issues ....................................................................... 20
Issues and Constraints....................................................................................................................20
Options.............................................................................................................................................21
Sustainability...................................................................................................................................22
8. Next Critical Steps.......................................................................................................... 23
9. Conclusion...................................................................................................................... 23
10. Statutory Declaration......................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
1
1. Institute Information
Project Name Improvement of export and domestic
markets for Vietnamese fruit through
improved post-harvest and supply
chain management.
Vietnamese Institution Southern Sub-Institute of Agricultural
Engineering and Post-Harvest
Technology (SIAEP)
Vietnamese Project Team Leader Mr Nguyen Duy Duc, M. Eng.
Australian Organisation Queensland Department of Primary
Industries and Fisheries (DPI & F)
Australian Personnel Mr. Robert Nissen
Dr. Peter Hofman
Mr Brett Tucker
Mr. Roland Holmes
Ms Marlo Rankin
Date commenced June 2005
Completion date (original) May 2008
Completion date (revised) June 2008
Reporting period Progress Report 3 Six Monthly January
2007
Contact Officer(s)
In Australia: Team Leader
Name: Mr. Robert Nissen Telephone: +61 07 54449631
Position: Project Leader Fax: +61 07 54412235
Organisation Queensland Department of
Primary Industries and
Fisheries (DPI & F)
Email: bob.nissen@dpi.qld.gov.au
In Australia: Administrative contact
Name: Michelle Robbins Telephone: +61 07 3346 2711
Position: Senior Planning Officer
(Emerging Technologies)
Fax: +61 07 3346 2727
Organisation Queensland Department
of Primary Industries and
Email: michelle.robbins@dpi.qld.gov.au
1
Fisheries (DPI & F)
In Viet Nam
Name: Mr Nguyen Duy Duc, Telephone: +84 (8) 8481151
Position: Director SIAEP Fax: +84 (8) 8438842
Organisation Southern Sub-Institute of
Agricultural Engineering and Post-
Harvest Technology (SIAEP)
Email: siaep@hcm.vnn.vn
2
2. Project Abstract
The fruit industry in Vietnam has a great potential and plays an important role in
agricultural production. In 2003, Vietnam exported US$43 million of high value fruit to
high-income countries and imported US$14 million of fruit and vegetables. Vietnam is
experiencing difficulties in competing with other Asian nations in export markets and its
own domestic market, especially with China and Thailand. This suggests that Vietnam’s
horticultural industries require substantial development to be globally competitive.
Vietnamese consumers are demanding safer and higher quality fruit. This project has
identified key pre-and post-harvest technology gaps that reduce product quality, safety
and consistency. Targeted training programs are focusing on the total supply chain and are
providing benefits by helping to implement quality management systems and GAP
systems at the village level, providing greater employment for the farming community.
This project embraces the five CARD strategies for rural development; and in particular;
strategies to increase production and competitiveness of agricultural systems; reduce
poverty and vulnerability, and increase stakeholder participation whilst ensuring
sustainability.
3. Executive Summary
The strategic plans developed as part of this CARD Project for mango and pomelo are now
being implemented by SIAEP and SOFRI team members.
Four members of the CARD Project team from SOFRI and the Director of SOFRI attended
the International Society for Horticultural Science, International Symposium on Supply Chain
Management, “Improving the performance of supply chains in the transitional economies,
Responding to the demands of integrated value chains” held in Hanoi Vietnam from 23-27
September 2007. Several excellent papers were presented by SOFRI staff to an international
audience. One paper focused on analysis of supply chains using strengths, weakness,
opportunities and threats analytical method for the tropical and subtropical fruit industry in
Vietnam. Another talk focused on the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and how they
related to the domestic and export market development for Vietnamese fruit.
In January 2008 a meeting held with Metro Cash and Carry, Le Thi Minh Trang, Quality
Assurance Manager and Stephane Maurin, Divisional Manager–Fresh Food to set up new
supply chains for Vietnamese’s farmer cooperatives. Talks focused on setting up trial
shipments of Cat Hoa Loc mango from 2 cooperative in the Tien Giang Province to Metro
Cash and Carry in Ho Chi Minh City.
Further economic studies were carried out on the production of high quality, high value Cat
Hoa Loc mango fruit for speciality markets in HCMC by SOFRI Staff. This study found that
fruit bagging during the May to August period could significantly increase incomes by 27%
lifting socio-economic standings of farmers.
3
4. Introduction & Background
Fruit and Vegetable crops are highly lucrative compared to staple crops. Horticultural
produce has high value-added and income generation potential when compared to livestock
and grain production. Horticulture is highly attractive especially for small scale farmers, and
has a comparative advantage, particularly where land holdings are small, labour is abundant
and markets reasonably accessible (Weinberger and Lumpkin, 2006). This situation is
particularly true in Mekong Delta and Central South Cost Province of Khanh Hoa, Viet Nam.
Ford et al., (2003), suggested the competitiveness of Vietnamese fruit industries were failing
due to poor, unstable product quality, no quality standards, poor post harvest technologies and
pre-harvest practices, lack of group co-operative marketing structures and little information
about supply chains, prices and customers needs.
This project is addressing these constraints by engaging with key Vietnamese stakeholders
from research institutes (SIAEP and SOFRI) and local farmers in the mango and pomelo
industries in Southern Viet Nam. This project has taken account of the total supply chain
network and focused on where significant benefits are to be gained in the pre- harvest, post-
harvest and marketing sectors.
The objectives of the project are:
• Improved pre-harvest technologies to produce high quality mango (integrated pest
management, integrated crop management, fruit fly control, maturity indices,
reduced pesticide residues, better environmental and human health etc)
• Improved mango and pomelo post-harvest technologies (eg cool chain management,
packaging, post-harvest dipping, ethylene ripening, waxing, washing and wetting
agents, quality assurance)
• Improved quality standards and quality assurance programs for mango and pomelo.
The approach and methodologies developed for these crops through this project will
be applied to other fruits and vegetables.
• Mapping of current supply chains to domestic and selected export markets, with
particular emphasis on determining consumer preferences and needs, and reporting
results back to farmers.
• Provide a better understanding and possible improvements of the supply chain by
Viet Namese fruit industries for mango and pomelo.
This project will fill capacity gaps and reduce major weaknesses in pre-and post-harvest
technologies improving product quality consistency and supply chain management and
planning. Highly specialised targeted training programs appropriate for institutions and
industry stakeholders will be provided.
At the local village and district level, cluster development of farmer/grower groups should
ensure better on-farm prices. This will increase power to these farmers which will benefit all
members of the supply chain (intermediaries to retailers) rather than the present power
brokers in the chain. Farm incomes will therefore increase and result in better standard of
living for rural families. In addition, if quality management systems are implemented at the
village and district level through more appropriate fruit quality standards, packaging and
grading systems, increase returns should result creating greater employment. The flow on
4
effects of this will benefit the poor in the rural areas, and specifically help provide more jobs
for rural women.
5. Progress to Date
Implementation Highlights
Implementation highlights of CARD Project activities
Training in GAP and IPM/IDM
The strategic plans developed as part of this CARD Project for mango and pomelo are now
being implemented by SIAEP and SOFRI team members. These activities align with the
proposed project activities 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 13 and project milestones 4, 7, 9 and 10.
Top 5 Priorities for the Mango Strategic Plan:- Listing in Order of Importance for Mango
Industry
1. Improve production process (e.g. follow GAP)
2. Improve the linkages between farmers – traders – customers, scientists and
government also need to be involved
3. Assessable market information for export and domestic markets
4. Improve packing and storing procedures/Need technical support to improve storing,
packing and packaging material
5. Government to help with planning and development for specialised fruit growing area
Top 5 Priorities for the Pomelo Strategic Plan:- Listing in Order of Importance for Mango
Industry
1. Supporting techniques from seedling–farming-harvesting (Guidance for GAP)
2. Advice/counsel on standards/specifications of products
3. Intensively farming and production areas
4. Training on IPM
5. Improving applicability of farming techniques and technologies of harvesting, packing
and transporting
In September-October 2007 and January-February 2008 CARD Project training of mango and
pomelo farmers via farmer schools was conducted by SIAEP and SOFRI and Australian
personnel.
This training focused on:
• the development of GAP including pest and disease management (IPM/IDM)
for both mango and pomelo
• improving pre- and post-harvest farming techniques and technologies for
mango and pomelo
• improving linkages between growers, traders, customers, scientists, extension
agents and government.
This training aligns with the strategic priorities for mango and pomelo:
• Priority one and two for mango
• Priority one, two, three, four and five for pomelo
5
CARD project capacity building (demonstration of skills obtained)
To document and test the competencies of SOFRI staff in applying supply chain analysis and
methodologies and quality assurance procedures (CARD Project milestone 10), four members
of the CARD Project team from SOFRI and the Director of SOFRI attended the International
Society for Horticultural Science, International Symposium on Supply Chain Management,
“Improving the performance of supply chains in the transitional economies, Responding to
the demands of integrated value chains” held in Hanoi Vietnam from 23-27 September 2007.
Several excellent papers were presented by SOFRI staff to an international audience. One
paper focused on analysis of supply chains using strengths, weakness, opportunities and
threats analytical method for the tropical and subtropical fruit industry in Vietnam. Another
talk focused on the Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and how they related to the domestic
and export market development for Vietnamese fruit which aligns with CARD project
milestone 7 and 10 and activities 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.
SOFRI Teams member who attend the conference were:
o Dr Nguyen Minh Chau (Director of SOFRI)
o Nguyen Van Hoa
o Le Thi Thu Hong
o Tran Nguyen Lie Minh
o Ta minh Tuan
Mr Nissen also presented two papers to this conference. One of Mr Nissen’s papers detailed
the development of new processes for evaluation and implementing new improved supply
chains operating in South-East Asia. This paper aligns with milestone 4 and 7, methodology
and analytical techniques and training material for supply chain analysis and development and
key issues and options for improved supply chain management as well as the roles and
responsibilities and implementation process to improve supply chain in South-East Asia (See
Appendix A for a copy of this paper).
Development of new supply chains
In January 2008 a meeting held with Metro Cash and Carry, Le Thi Minh Trang, Quality
Assurance Manager and Stephane Maurin, Divisional Manager–Fresh Food, focused on
setting up trial shipments of Cat Hoa Loc mango from 2 cooperative in the Tien Giang
Province to Metro Cash and Carry in Ho Chi Minh City. Quality guides developed as part of
this CARD project (Milestone 4) and now being finalised and will be used to assure product
quality of the Cat Hoa Loc mango during these trial shipments to Metro.
Four different packaging systems will be employed in these trial shipments and experiments.
These experiments will determine the most economically viable and appropriate packaging
system for Cat Hoa Loc Mango in Southern Vietnam. This aligns with CARD project
activities 8, 9, 10 and 13 and with priority 4 and 3 of the mango strategic plan developed by
this CARD Project.
Farmer training schools and workshops conducted
September-October farmer training schools
Training in September–October 2007 was carried out by the Vietnamese staff of SIAEP and
SOFRI institutes and Australia personnel. Courses were conducted in My Tho, Tien Giang
Province and at Nha Trang, Khanh Hoa Province, Vietnam for both mango and pomelo
farmers. Intensive farmer schools and training workshops were one day in length and
structured as:
6
• Day one - pre-harvest training
• Introduce supply chain concept
o Analysis of the Vietnamese supply chains
• Pre harvest (based on GAP)
o Orchard design
o Orchard pruning and training
o IPM training
o IDM training
• Day two - post-harvest training
o Post harvest
• Handling
• Harvesting (picking)
• Sorting and grading
• Packing
• Storing
The process employed during training workshops and farmer schools allows farmers,
extension agents and researchers to discuss ideas, develop solutions to problems encountered
in developing improved post-harvest practices and new supply chains. Workshops conducted
in September-October 2007 and January-February 2008 by Australian trainers were held at
SIAEP and SOFRI training rooms as well as military training rooms in My Tho. Whilst these
workshops were specifically designed as farmer schools, using participatory action learning
principles, trainers researchers and extension agents were in attendance (see Appendix B for
farmer group discussion notes taken during farmer training schools and Appendix C for list of
participants).
January-February 2008 farmer training schools
Training in January-February 2008 was carried out by the Australia personnel. Courses were
conducted at SOFRI, Tien Giang Province, Vietnam. Rowland Holmes and Robert Nissen
conducted a two day workshop for the trainer and farmer training school on mango pests and
diseases.
These training activities listed above align with project activities 6, 7, 11 and 12 and project
milestones 7, 9 and the Strategic Plans for mango and pomelo developed by this CARD
Project (see Appendix C for list of participants).
Development of new supply chains for mango and pomelo
In September-October 2007 and January-February 2008 further workshops were conducted
and analysis of data collected for the development of quality guides in consultation with the
supply chain participants for mango and pomelo. In January-February 2008 an overview of
the draft copy of the Cat Hoa Loc mango Quality Guide was shown and discussed with Metro
Cash and Carry Le Thi Minh Trang, Quality Assurance Manager and Stephane Maurin,
Divisional Manager–Fresh Food to determine their needs and input. These activities align
with CARD project Milestone 4 and activities 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 and with focus on
further development of “Metro” type supply chain as suggested by the CARD PMU in their
MS6 appraisal report.
Socio-economic analysis of supply chains
7
In September-October 2007 and January-February 2008 further workshops were conducted on
gathering socio-economic data of mango and pomelo supply chain in the Mekong Delta of
Southern Vietnam. Analysis of data is continuing and further data collection and analysis is
being undertaken by the Vietnamese institutes SIAEP, SOFRI and Australian personnel.
These activities align with CARD project activities 8, 9, 10, 12 and 13 and milestones 7, 9
and 10.
Workshop evaluations
The ORID system was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the eight farmer training schools
and workshops conducted in September-October 2007 and January-February 2008. Both
Vietnamese farmers and SIAEP and SOFRI staff were surveyed at the completion of each
workshop. The workshops conducted were:
• Mango and pomelo orchard management
• Mango and pomelo pre-harvest management to optimise product quality
• Mango and pomelo post-Harvest management to optimise product quality
• Mango orchard management and IPM/IDM to optimise product quality
Analysis of the workshops for September-October 2007 using the ORID system showed on
average