Ethnic minority communities in the remote
mountainous northern provinces of Vietnam
are among the poorest in the country, with
limited access to agricultural land, health
facilities, markets and infrastructure. Van
Minh and Lang San communes of Na Ri
district in Bac Kan province have poverty rates
of 63-68% [1]. Forested land comprises 84%
and 90% respectively of the total land area and
is of paramount importance for community
livelihoods, including collection of firewood
and harvesting food and herbal medicinal
plants. However, lack of access to utilise forest
land and unequal allocation of forest areas to
the poorer families have led to serious poverty
of many households. Management of the forest
has also exacerbated the situation through
many problems: (i) low productivity due to
forest degradation after excessive use and little
investment; (ii) perceptions of forest as
common land with free access, with unclear
boundaries and poorly defined ownership
obligations; (iii) few incentives to reinvest in
the forest (no security) and reluctance to take
direct responsibility for the land; (iv) poor
awareness of user rights, forest laws and
regulations, and rights of participation in
official processes such as forest land
allocation; and (v) very limited support from
government agencies in approaches to
effectively use the forest land and earn income
8 trang |
Chia sẻ: ttlbattu | Lượt xem: 1847 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Đề tài achievements and lesson learn from implementation of community-Based forest development and management, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Collaboration for Agriculture and Rural Development (CARD) Program
228
ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSON LEARN FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF
COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT
Project title: Sustainable community-based forest development and management in some
high-poverty areas in Bac Kan province
Project code: CARD 017/06VIE
Authors: Tran Van Dien1, Tran Thi Thu Ha1 and Khongsak Pinyopusarerk2
Project Implementing organisations:
1 Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry, Thai Nguyen, Vietnam
2 CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
1. Introduction
Ethnic minority communities in the remote
mountainous northern provinces of Vietnam
are among the poorest in the country, with
limited access to agricultural land, health
facilities, markets and infrastructure. Van
Minh and Lang San communes of Na Ri
district in Bac Kan province have poverty rates
of 63-68% [1]. Forested land comprises 84%
and 90% respectively of the total land area and
is of paramount importance for community
livelihoods, including collection of firewood
and harvesting food and herbal medicinal
plants. However, lack of access to utilise forest
land and unequal allocation of forest areas to
the poorer families have led to serious poverty
of many households. Management of the forest
has also exacerbated the situation through
many problems: (i) low productivity due to
forest degradation after excessive use and little
investment; (ii) perceptions of forest as
common land with free access, with unclear
boundaries and poorly defined ownership
obligations; (iii) few incentives to reinvest in
the forest (no security) and reluctance to take
direct responsibility for the land; (iv) poor
awareness of user rights, forest laws and
regulations, and rights of participation in
official processes such as forest land
allocation; and (v) very limited support from
government agencies in approaches to
effectively use the forest land and earn income
[2].
The Land Law which came into effect on July
1, 2004 allows communities (villages) to
receive land and forest land [3]. However,
there is no mechanism to realise this option. A
project supported by AusAID’s Collaboration
for Agriculture and Rural Development
(CARD) program developed mechanisms
under Community Forestry Management
including participatory land use planning and
land allocation to facilitate land distribution
and address the sustainable management of the
forest.
The project Goal is
Sustainable improvement in livelihood security
of disadvantaged forest-dependent people in
northern mountainous areas, through
empowerment of access to forest and forest
land, influence over forest land management,
conservation of the natural resources and
development of relevant skills.
2. Methodology
Four villages: Na Muc and Khuoi Lieng in
Van Minh commune and To Dooc and Ban
Sang in Lang San commune in Na Ri district,
Bac Kan province which have community
forest lands were selected to be the research
site for the project. The community forest
lands were target area for project interventions
which included land use planning, forest land
allocation, forest enrichment, nursery,
plantation and agro-forestry development. The
CARD 017/06 – Community based forest management
229
quality of community forest was assessed
through forest survey to identify the
productivity as well as biodiversity. The social
economic condition of local community and
the dependency of livelihood of local
community on the forest were identified by
socio-economic survey. The data relating to
land use planning, forest land allocation, forest
enrichment, nursery, plantation and agro-
forestry models were also recorded in the field
based samples. The processes of land
allocation, management of community forest
development fund, implementation of
community forest management plan were also
recorded. The outcomes and impacts of
training activities were assessed at the phase
out period. Cost benefit for each community
forest management models was analyzed to
evaluate the effectiveness of each activity.
3. Results and discussions
3.1 Allocation of community forest lands
to communities
Allocation of communication forest lands to
communities was firstly implemented in Bac
Kan province. The allocation process met
many difficulties both paper work and field
work. The most difficult work was solving
conflicts on the border of community forest.
In the past, community forest was considered
common property which was freely exploited
by local people from many villages. Therefore
it was extremely difficult to allocate the
community forest to only one particular
village. However, by participatory approach in
solving the problems, consensus was achieved
among neighboring villages. The borders of
community forest in the four pilot villages
were clearly defined and field maps
constructed. The formal processes of
community forest land allocation have been
completed for the four project pilot villages
with “Red Book” for long-term use rights
(Table 1). This has given local communities
the confidence to contribute and invest labor
and other inputs to the protection and
development of community forest lands for
overall local benefits.
Table 1: Results of community forest land allocation in four target villages
No. Village Community forest land allocated (ha) % of Community forest land
allocated
1 Ban Sang 154.3 100
2 To Dooc 45.1 100
3 Na Muc 118.3 100
4 Khuoi Lieng 121.1 100
Lessons learnt
- The boundaries of community forest must
be clearly defined and accepted by all
neighboring villages by participatory
approach before processing the paper work.
- Strong cooperation between district and
commune authorities, especially between
Forest Protection Department and
Department of Natural Resources and
Environment in conducting the field work
as well as the paper work play a key role in
the success of the community forest land
allocation.
- Adequate finance resources is needed to
conduct field work by the commune and
district staff.
3.2 Establishment of community forest
management (CFM) plan
After receiving the official rights of using the
CF lands, CFM plans have been established for
each village. The CFM within each village
consists of two elements: (1) regulations which
provide a legal framework for village members
to implement the CFM plan at the village level,
and (2) a CFM plan which describes and lists
the activities that would be undertaken. Both
the regulations and plans were a result of
separate village meetings and discussion.
Tran Van Dien, Tran Thi Thu Ha & Khongsak Pinyopusarerk
230
Therefore while the general scope has been
maintained across the four villages, the
contents differ depending on the land use
preferences and enforcement level of each
village.
General contents of CFM
regulations
- Rights and responsibilities of all
community members in forest protection
and development
- Rules to protect forests and mobilize human
resources to protect and develop forests
- Logging, buying and selling of timber and
non-timber products
- Animal grazing in the community forest
- Prevention of forest fire
- Checking and preventing outsiders from
shifting cultivation, illegal logging or
hunting, and illegal buying, selling and
transporting timber/non-timber/animals
within the village.
- Cooperation among community members in
forest protection and development,
production services and sale of products.
- Collaboration with other villages to protect
and effectively develop the forests
- Regulations on penalty for infringement of
the forest protection rules
- Regulations on sharing benefits among
community members
- The regulations should be presented to all
community members and submitted for
approval by Commune People's Committee.
General contents of CMF Plan
- New plantation plan such as chice of
species, planting area, where and when to
plant labor cost, number of seedlings, and
sources of seedlings
- Nursery plan, seedling production
- Maintenance and protection
- Harvesting plans
- Human resource (labor input) plan
- Other activities such as agro-forestry
Lesson learnt from establishment of CFM
plan
- It is necessary to modify the Guidelines of
MARD on Community Forest Management
(Figure 1) which was issued on November
27, 2006 (Decision 106/2006/BNN-PTNT)
for more simple and practical in local
conditions [4].
- Participatory approach to develop the CFM
is crucial factor for establishment of a
feasible and practical CFM plan.
- Staff of district Forest Protection
Department and commune extension
workers are main technical sources to
provide support to community in
developing the CFM plan.
3.3 Implementation of CFM plans
3.3.1 Involvement of community members in
CFM
Within each village, a CFM board of five
persons has been elected by open votes to
oversee overall implementation. All four
villages have placed a strong emphasis on
plantation forest, protection of watershed areas
and commercial wood production. During
meetings and discussions which were attended
by at least one member of every household, all
household representatives expressed their
commitment to contribute labor inputs in the
implementation of the plan. Another common
agreement across all four villages was an
attempt to reduce and stop shifting cultivation
and free grazing in community forest areas.
Number of households involved in CFM is
presented in Table 2.
Table 2: Current involvement of community members participating CFM [5]
Village Total households
involved in CFM
Total males aged >15
involved in CFM
Total females aged >15
involved in CFM
Quantity % Quantity % Quantity %
Na Muc 23 100 54 100 52 100
Khuoi Lieng 35 100 81 100 72 100
To Dooc 19 73 30 46.7 32 46.3
Ban Sang 69 100 157 100 145 100
CARD 017/06 – Community based forest management
231
3.3.2 Capacity building for local people
Based on the training needs of local
community, various trainings were conducted
as presented in Table 3. Most of the trainings
were conducted using Farmer Field School
(FFS) approach. The trainings helped all local
community members to be aware of laws on
forest protection and development and be more
knowledgeable and skillful in technical issues
relating to forest management.
Table 3: Training courses conducted in the project area [6]
No. Training topics Number of direct
beneficiaries
1 Land-use planning and land allocation 26
2 Planning and implementation of community forest management 25
3 Village nursery propagation 125
4 Plantation forest development 82
5 Law on forest protection and development 80
6 Agro-forestry model for income generation 64
7 Sustainable harvest of non-timber forest products 82
In addition to the above, this CARD project
also organized study tours to other CFM
projects and community workshops for sharing
experience.
3.3.3 Establishment of village-based
nurseries
One of the constraints in development of both
community forest lands and household
allocated lands is the lack of quality forest
seedlings. Some projects had provided
seedlings to area but it was not successful.
The survival rate was very low probably due to
the long distance in transport of seedlings to
the village sites. Therefore, the establishment
of village nursery garden to produce the
seedling near plantation site is not only to
ensure the high survival rate of seedlings but
also create potential income generation for
local people. The project facilitated the
establishment of village-based community
nurseries to raise quality tree seedlings for sale
or distribution to land owners. The project has
paid special attention to using seed of good
genetic quality. Key inputs provided by the
project included training in nursery
management and provision of access to quality
genetic seed sources of Acacia mangium (keo)
(from CSIRO and Forest Science Institute of
Vietnam) and Manglietia conifera (Mo).
During three years of project implementation,
a large number of forest seedlings were
produced for planting in both community
forest lands and household allocated lands as
presented in the Table 4.
Tran Van Dien, Tran Thi Thu Ha & Khongsak Pinyopusarerk
232
Table 4: Number of seedlings produced annually in four target villages
Village Manglietia conifera Acacia mangium Total
Na Muc 30,000 40,000 70,000
Khuoi Lieng 20,000 30,000 50,000
To Dooc 20,000 30,000 50,000
Ban Sang 30,000 40,000 70,000
Table 5 reveals that a community requires at
least 5 million VND to establish a nursery and
more than 16.5 million VND per year for
operating expenses. The production cost for
each seedling is only 309 VND, while the
current market price is 700 - 1000 VND.
Table 5: Costs for a village-based nursery producing 70,000 seedlings/year [7]
Cost item Cost (VND)
Construction of nursery garden (capital cost) 5,120,000
Operating cost 16,498,000
Total cost 21,618,000
Cost per seedling 309
3.3.4 Agro-forestry models in community
forest lands
The design of the agro-forestry model takes
into account the need for income generation
for communities. Expanding market
opportunities exist for planted trees of a
number of species reflecting the transition
from dependency on a natural forest to a
planted resource. By selecting appropriate
species well adapted to the local environment,
which are fast growing and meet a market
need, communities can benefit financially from
tree planting projects either on community
land or other land surplus to agricultural
requirement. Crops on the other hand will
provide opportunities for added food security
with surplus crops providing additional
income. The areas for the agro-forestry model
trials are about one hectare each village.
The selection of species was based on the key
species recommended in the land use planning
surveys which were considered to have
potential as either commercial species or for
use in alley cropping systems. For timber
production, Acacia (Keo), Manglietia conifera
(Mo) and Melia azedarach (Xoan) were
preferred by villagers, and these were the tree
species for this model. In addition, one fast-
growing, multi purpose species, Cassia (cot
khi) has been included for planting on the
contours for soil erosion control. Agricultural
crop planted between tree rows was chosen by
villagers based on local experience. Hybrid
corn, improved soybean, taro and cassava have
been selected for growing in agro-forestry
models. Table 6 shows the yields of the
agriculture crops in the agro-forestry models in
the target villages. Table 7 shows height
growth one year after planting in the four agro-
forestry plots.
CARD 017/06 – Community based forest management
233
Table 6: Agricultural crop yields in 2008 and 2009 in the four project villages
Unit: kg/ha
Years Crop Na Muc Khuoi Lieng To Dooc Ban Sang
2008 Soybean 400 630 650 700
Taro - 300 - -
Cassava - 5,000 - -
2009 Maize 4,500 2,000 2,200 2,000
Soybean 1,400 - - -
Table 7: Plant height of forest tree in agro-forestry models after two years of planting
Unit: m
Species Na Muc Khuoi Lieng To Dooc Bang Sang
Manglietia conifera 2.0-2.5 2.0-2.5 1.5-2.0 1.5-2.0
Acacia mangium 2.5-3.0 2.5-3.0 2.0-2.5 2.0-2.5
Melia azedarach 2.0-2.5 2.0-2.5 - -
3.3.5 Community forest development funds
(CFDF)
Community Forest Development Fund has
been developed by the community through
initial seed money from CARD project. The
main purpose of this fund is for forest
development activities in community forest
areas in the village. Activities related to
community forest development can use this
fund following the community's regulations.
This fund will be maintained and grown for
long-term purpose. The fund is managed by
Community Forest Management Board.
Financial issue is reported to village meetings
to ensure transparency.
Sources for CFDF
a) Funding from CARD project:
- CARD project contributed 1,000 AUD
(13 million VND) as "seed money" to
establish the fund.
- Households who receive seedlings from
the village nursery to plant on their own
land must contribute 50 VND per seedling
to the fund (following regulations of
nursery management).
b) Income from timber and non-timber forest
products from the community forest area:
- Contribute 20% of total income from non-
timber forest product harvest such as
mushroom, fruits, and medicinal plants to
the fund.
- Households within the village community
are permitted to use timber from the
community forest areas to build their
houses; they have to contribute 20% of
the total value to the fund.
c) Interest from loan
- The fund can be used for loan for
agricultural and forestry production with
low interest of 0.6% per month based on
demand of household members of the
community forest.
d) Penalty from illegal actions following CFM
regulation
- All fines from illegal actions following
the CFM regulations will be put into the
fund.
Management of CFDF
- CFM Board has a responsibility to
manage the CFDF.
- Use of the fund follows government's
financial regulations (receipts and reports
are required).
- Accountant and head of the Community
Forest Management Board must report to
Commune People’s Committee on
financial issues
Status of community forest development funds
after two years of implementation (Jan, 2008 -
Jan, 2010) is presented in Table 8.
Tran Van Dien, Tran Thi Thu Ha & Khongsak Pinyopusarerk
234
Table 8. Status of community forest development funds in four villages after 2 years of operation
Unit: Thousands. VND
Indicator Khuoi Lieng Na Muc To Dooc Ban Sang
Principal funds 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000
Fund growth 6,160 7,068 10,000 3,188
Loans 14,650 10,300 21,000 7,500
Expenditure for CFM 1,465 127 850 594
Outstanding balance 3,195 7,784 2,735 9,968
The figure in Table 8 indicates that CFDF has
been well managed by local community. The
fund size of all four villages has increased
significantly. The poor households in the
community can access to CFDF as
microfinance sources for forest development.
Lessons learnt from implementation of CFM
plan
- Capacity building for local people on the
rights to access to the community forest
lands, the rights to harvest and the
responsibility to protect the community
forest is considered the most important
activity for the success of the
implementation of CFM.
- Control of free grazing in Bac Kan is a
crucial factor for the success of the agro-
forestry models and reforestation in
community forest lands
- Clear demarcation of the community
forest boundary can avoid the conflicts
between villages in harvesting forest
products in the community forest.
3.4 The impacts/changes due to
implementation CFM plan
Survey to identify the impacts and the changes
due to implementation of CFM plan on the
communities of four villages was conducted in
March 2010. Results of the survey show that
implementation of CFM plan has positive
impacts on communities in term of livelihood
improvement, environment protection and
forest quality (Table 9). 57-100% members of
communities agreed that implementation of
CFM plan has decreased the number of illegal
cases of forest exploitation or violation. 59-
100% members of communities responded that
community forest was well protected so it has
been enriched. Therefore it creates a better
environment such as having water throughout
the year, less natural disasters in local areas.
In addition, the implementation of CFM plan
has created the equality and solidarity in the
communities.
Table 9. Impacts and changes due to application of CFM plan [5]
Indicator Percentage of local people agreed (%)
Na Muc Khuoi Lieng To Dooc Ban Sang
Decreased illegal forest exploitation 100 94.1 81.8 86.4
Enriched