Abstract. The article is about a new way of assessment for students in teacher
education colleges/universities under the new education program. The content of
assessment focused on ethic value, professional value, professional science competencies,
pedagogical competencies and scientific research competencies of students, quantity
and quality assurance, combination of formative assessment and summative assessment,
independent assessment and self-assessment; cooperation between administration,
academic departments of Hanoi National University of Education and pedagogical practice
or internship institutes .
8 trang |
Chia sẻ: thanhle95 | Lượt xem: 178 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Renewal for graduation assessment in teacher education colleges under the new education program, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
HNUE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE DOI: 10.18173/2354-1075.2017-0133
Educational Sci., 2017, Vol. 62, Iss. 6, pp. 91-98
This paper is available online at
RENEWAL FOR GRADUATION ASSESSMENT IN TEACHER EDUCATION
COLLEGES UNDER THE NEW EDUCATION PROGRAM
Phan Trong Ngo
Institute of Educational Research, Hanoi National University of Education
Abstract. The article is about a new way of assessment for students in teacher
education colleges/universities under the new education program. The content of
assessment focused on ethic value, professional value, professional science competencies,
pedagogical competencies and scientific research competencies of students, quantity
and quality assurance, combination of formative assessment and summative assessment,
independent assessment and self-assessment; cooperation between administration,
academic departments of Hanoi National University of Education and pedagogical practice
or internship institutes .
Keywords: Assessment; graduation assessment for students in teacher education colleges;
Renew targets of assessment, content of assessment, form of assessment
1. Introduction
On the road of vocational education reform, the Ministry of Education and Training
(MOET), has shifted from knowledge-based educational system to capacity and vocational
quality-based development. On the other hand, MOET has renewed the method of assessment
and recognition of graduation for learners, according to Resolution No.29-NQ/TW of the 8th
Congress of the Party. Central Committee XI dated 04/11/2013 on the radical and comprehensive
renewal of education and training,it stated that assessment is based on knowledge and practical
competencies, discipline and codes of ethics. It is recommended to combineformative assessment
with summative assessment, evaluation of teachers and self-assessment of learners; assessment of
schools and parents and community [4].
In fact, from the academic year 2014 - 2015, the educational colleges (pedagogical colleges)
developed training program in the direction of competency-based development for pedagogical
students [9]. Meanwhile, the graduation assessment for students is still in compliance with
Regulation 43/2007/QD-BGDDT of the Ministry of Education and Training on approval of
formal university and college training under the credit system (herein called Regulation 43) [1].
Over the past time, there have been some researches ininnovation of testing and assessment
of learning outcomes of learners. However, the new researches mainly have dealed with the
theory of objectives, content, procedures of assessments based on competency approach [5,
7], or researches on the evaluation of learning outcomes in the particular field of students [2,
5, 7, 12, 13]. Consequently, the issue of graduation assessment of pedagogical students under
Received date: 15/3/2017. Published date: 27/4/2017.
Contact: Phan Trong Ngo, e-mail: ngotamly@gmail.com
91
Phan Trong Ngo
the new curriculum has not been set yet. This article is to produce graduation assessment for
undergraduatestudents of pedagogy in order to meet the needs of vocational training competencies
of the current education colleges.
2. Content
2.1. The training program and assessment of the current bachelor of pedagogy
of pedagogic universities
2.1.1. The bachelor’s program of upper secondary teachers in the current teacher training
colleges
From SY 2014- 2015, the teacher training colleges nationally delivered the training
program of pedagogy with total of 135 credits. The curriculum was designed in accordance
with the Professional Standards for Secondary Teacher issued by the Ministry of Education
and Training in 2009 [2]. The training programs are aimed at the formation of pedagogical
values and qualities; specialized Science Competencies and Core Pedagogical Competencies
including Individual Learner Development Capabilities, Teaching Competence, Educational
Competency, Scientific Research Competency, Community and Social Development Competency,
ICT Capacity, Academic Learning Competency, Communication Capacity, Cooperation Capacity,
etc. In the program, knowledge and pedagogical skills are increased from 18% to 25% of the total
number of credits. Generally, the curriculum of pedagogical training of the current colleges has
approached in the direction of developing qualities and competencies of teaching according to the
Resolution 29-NQ/TW [9, 16-19].
The current practice of graduation assessment of bachelor’s degree in pedagogy [1, 16-19].
At present, all colleges are based on the Regulation 43/2007/QĐ-BGD & ĐT to
evaluate graduation requirements for undergraduate students of pedagogy. The current graduation
assessment practice of current education colleges can be summarized in the following points:
- Learning outcomes of students are evaluated according to the expectedoutcomes of the
courses after each semester. The scores are based on part or all of the section scores combined with
the final exam. Exams of the course are held at the end of each semester. Each semester, students
have three-week intervals for practice and examination. Graduation assessment for students in the
form of credit-basedsystem of the whole course is relevant with international trends.
- Some students are qualified under the regulations of the colleges and the faculty and they
will be selected to carry out the graduation thesis. The remaining students are required to take
some modules (credits) in equivalent. The content of the modules is proposed by the faculty and
approved by the colleges.
- The whole course lasts about 10-12 weeks (6-8 credits) of internship at suitable
educational institutions. The evaluation of internships is responsibility of teachers at the local
institutions;
- Graduation evaluation of bachelor’s degree for students is classified into 5 levels: A, B, C,
D, E. Students are required to obtain certificates of Physical Education (PE) and Defense Education
(DE) and they are not included in the academic transcript.
- The outstanding achievements of students in the study and scientific research, social
activities (including scientific articles, paper works, and scientific research awards) are added to
the points of the relevant subjects. They are not included in the graduation profiles.
- Graduation review is only conducted for students who qualify all the requirements and
92
Renewal for graduation assessment in teacher education colleges
earn enough credit points. No offering the graduation exam as the final test to assess students’
competencies and professional skills before graduation.
- There is no self-assessment of students in evaluating their academic performance and
graduation.
- Students who are eligible for graduation are recognized by the colleges and the principal
of the colleges signs a graduation decision for the students.
Some shortcomings of graduation assessment of education bachelor’s degree in comparison
with the requirements of the Resolution 29-NQ / TW and the current practice of training reforms
at the educationcolleges.
Compared with the requirements of the Resolution 29-NQ / TW and the training practice in
the competence-based development approach at current colleges, Regulation 43 and the graduation
assessment practice of the colleges have revealed some shortcomings:
- Training and assessment according to knowledge-based system. This approach is outdated
in comparison with the reform requirements of Resolution 29-NQ/TW and compared to training
programs being implemented at the education colleges.
- The content of graduation assessments of new students is mainly directed to the
professional knowledge, and skills of students. The values and qualities of students have not been
assessed in the program.
- Research competency which is very limited for students who are not qualified enough to
do the graduation thesis is an important capacity in the competency framework of the teacher.
- There is limitation in the roles and responsibilities of teachers/lecturers in evaluating
students’ graduation internship. Meanwhile, teachers/lecturers are responsible for their training
outcomes.
- The current evaluation of graduation is mainly based on the external assessment (carried
out by the independent institution) without the participation of students in the assessment process.
These shortcomings caused the drawback in the graduation assessment of undergraduate
and postgraduate students of pedagogy in the education system in comparison with the
requirements for comprehensive assessment and competence-based development approach in
teacher education which is clearly stated in Resolution 29-NQ/ TW and contradicts with the new
program.
2.2. Graduation assessment experience for pedagogical students in teacher
education colleges around the world
Analysis of the graduation assessment for pedagogical students of some universities
around the world can draw lessons for the graduation assessment renewal in our country today.
Researches include Stanford University (USA) [14]; Hyoho University, University of Teacher
Education (Japan) [15]; University of Aix-Marseiller (France) and Southern Cross University
(SCU-Australia) [20]. It is possible to draw some common points or highlights in the graduation
assessment of the above mentioned universities: Graduation Assessments for pedagogical students
are conducted by accumulating credit points for modules and from the results of internships at the
internship institutes.
- The content of the evaluation is based on the teacher’s professional standards and the
requirements of the teaching profession with the aim of demonstrating the ability to meet the
vocational standards of the students as a teacher corresponding after graduation.
- Evaluation not only focused on the final goal but also highlighted the purpose of
93
Phan Trong Ngo
information, feedback and improvementof students. The assessment tools are also tools for students
to organize learning, self-learning, and improving themselves.
- Students are involved in varying degrees in the evaluation procedures of learning outcomes
and progress and graduation.
- At the end of the course, students will do a presentation (graduation report) of
the whole course. This is particularly emphasized in Stanford University (USA) [14]. The
presentation includes a video of specific teaching experience of students. Students actively selected
content, scripted and filmed in accordance with professional standards. They actively propose
solutionstothe council and persuade the council of his/her competence with the relevant evident.
- A graduation profile is a collection of learning outcomes and individual internships.
The experience of assessing the academic results and graduation of the above universities
should be analyzed and applied in the graduation assessment practice for pedagogical students in
our country.
2.3. Some innovative measures for graduation assessment for undergraduate
students of pedagogy in education colleges in our country
Derived from the requirements for renewal of graduation assessment in vocational training
of students under Resolution 29-NQ/TW, from the training programs which are being implemented
in the education universities as well as from the inadequacies in the current graduate assessment
for pedagogy studentsin Vietnam and learning international experience from other countries, it
is necessary and appropriate to adjust the graduation assessment for undergraduate pedagogical
students in the teacher education colleges in our country in the following directions:
2.3.1. Requirement of graduation assessment for undergraduate pedagogy students
- First: the evaluation must be conducted in the spirit of Resolution 29-NQ/TW [4].
- Second:, The content of the assessment follows the professional standards of upper
secondary school teachers issued by the Ministry of Education and Training [2]; It should be
entitled with learning outcomes standards and the training programs of the current education
colleges. It is proposed to transform from a knowledge-based assessment to assessment of the
teacher’s values, qualities and competencies.
- Third: The evaluation must be based on the key, reasonable points and overcome the
inadequacies of Regulation 43/2007/QĐ-BGD & ĐT in the new context.
- Fourth: The assessment not only emphasizes the final outcomes of the original goals, but
also enhances the information and improvement/ progress of the students. The assessment tools
are also tools for students to organize learning, self-learning, and improving themselves.
2.3.2. A number of graduation assessments for undergraduate pedagogical students meet
the requirements of the reform under the Resolution 29-NQ/TW and current
training practice in the teacher education colleges
(i). Assessment content: it is recommended to provideadditional assessment of the values
and qualities of pedagogy students, to ensure comprehensiveness of the content of the assessment.
(ii) Form of assessment: Maintain a graduation assessment based on the cumulative credits
earned on credits and on the results of hands-on teaching practice during the internship. It should
add two new forms of assessment:
- Self-assessments of students on the values, qualities and competences achieved in the
94
Renewal for graduation assessment in teacher education colleges
course. A self-assessment has a faculty’s review of the student’s achievement at five levels: A, B,
C, D, F [1], and it is also a condition for graduation assessment and recorded in graduation profile.
Self-assessment of students is agreed upon in the school’s common format.
- General test
+ The objective is to comprehensively evaluate the value and competency of students gained
in the course. General test is the final test before graduation. Therefore, the general test must reflect
the final outcomesof the student’s education and training. It means the test should be directed to
the vocational skills test of the student before graduation.
+ The content of the general test can be divided into either the following ways: Organization
of student learning activities (teaching activities), combination of pedagogical situations or
learning activities on theme-based education (educational activity) and pedagogical problem
solving.
+ Forms of assessment: Select one of two options: Option 1: Organizethe practice test at
the internship institutes. In this way, the studentscan choose his or her topic for the test; design
the activities, and then register with the Teacher Education Colleges and the Internship institutes
to assign the teachers/ tutorsfor evaluation. Option 2: Students makingvideo on the pedagogical
activities(1- 2 hours in length). In this way, students design their own topics and make a video
within the pedagogical internships (certified by the internship institutes) and send them to the
Teacher Education Colleges. The colleges will give scores on the completed video.
Scores are taken according to credit system. In order to graduate, students must reach the
required level.
(iii). Adjustment of the graduation thesis regulations
Currently, the excellent students in the 4th year are selected to do graduation thesis (thesis)
with a certain proportion. The rest has to study and take some other tests in specialized science
with the same number of credits. This method is not reasonable. Students who are not chosen to
do the thesis will not be allowed to conduct scientific research in a systematic manner. Scientific
research, meanwhile, is a compulsory requirement for teachers in upper secondary schools and is
a criterion for the student’s competencies in the learning outcomes. Moreover, in the new general
education curriculum, scientific research is one of elective subjects. Therefore, in the education
colleges, students need to experience doing scientific research.
To overcome this problem, it is necessary to stipulate that 100% of students must complete
the graduation thesis in the course.
Graduation thesis is accounted for 5/135 credits (1 remaining credit is for the general test)
The score of graduation thesis is an evidence of the scientific research capacity of students
to graduate and must reach the required level.
(iv) Outstanding outcomes of students
In the current graduate assessment, the extra outcomes of students always include articles,
scientific reports; books; publications, scientific incentives, professional certificates; educational
and social activities are less encouraged. In fact, these activities provide positive support as well as
a clear demonstration of pedagogical capacity, scientific research capacity and career development
capacity for students. Therefore, such outcomes in the course are valuable as extra points, added
to the graduation test results. The outcomes and scores for the types of educational and social
activities should be clearly defined and encouraged so that students should know and strive.
The content and forms of graduation assessment for pedagogical students can be
summarized as bellows:
95
Phan Trong Ngo
No
Content of
assessment
Forms of
assessment
Who will
assess
Time of
assessment
Graduation
Record
1
Values and
qualities of
pedagogy
Self-study of
students
Academic
Faculty/
Students
Final course
Self-study
Sheet of
students
2
Specialized
academic
capacity
Scores of the
subjects
Academic
Faculty,
College
Final course Credit points
3
General
knowledge
and skills of
pedagogy
Accumulate
credits
Academic
Faculty,
College
Before
internship
Credit points
4
Knowledge
and skills of
teaching and
education of
subject matters
Accumulate
credits
Academic
Faculty/
Department
Before
internship
Credit points
5
Competency of
teaching and
education of
students
Internship
Internship
institutes
During
and after
internship
Credit points
General test
Faculty/
Department
During
internship
Credit points
6
Scientific
Research
competency
Graduation
thesis
Faculty
After
internship
Credit points
7
Physical
education
and Defense
education
Take the
test for
certificates
Faculty
The whole
course
Certificates
8
Outstanding
outcomes
Accumulate
outcomes
Students Final course Evident
With the content and forms of assessment above, the graduation assessment for students
of Bachelor’s Degree will meet the requirements of assessing qualities and vocational skills for
students. It is a combination offormative and summative assessment; independent assessment (by
teacher education colleges and internship institutes) with internal assessment (self-assessment of
students) and qualitative and quantitative assessments.
2.4. Experts survey on measures of renovation of graduation assessment for
undergraduate students of teacher education colleges nowsaday
The survey wasconducted with 35 Deans and 02 Heads of Academic Department of Hanoi
National University of Education and Ho Chi Minh University of Education. The discussion
focused on two main topics: a) Agree (or disagree) with measures for renovating graduation
96
Renewal for graduation assessment in teacher education colleges
assessments for proposed bachelor’s degree students; and b) Comments and feedbacks for
improvement of the proposed measures. The results of the questionnaires showed that 78.3% of the
respondents agreed with the proposed graduation assessment measures for pedagogical students;
21.7% is still confused; No one disagreed.
Of the 8 people (21.7%), only 3 people (8.1%) concernedthat the assessment of values and
qualities are importanthowever, it was difficult to quantify and be objective evaluate them; 3 people
(8.1%) suggested that no final exams should be taken and 02 people (5.4%) were concerned that
if 100% of students who qualified