Question: How can firms enter foreign markets?
Firms can enter foreign markets through exporting
licensing or franchising to host country firms
a joint venture with a host country firm
a wholly owned subsidiary in the host country to serve that market
The advantages and disadvantages of each entry mode is determined by
transport costs and trade barriers
political and economic risks
firm strategy
11 trang |
Chia sẻ: baothanh01 | Lượt xem: 892 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Bài giảng Global Business Today 6e - Chapter 12: Entering Foreign Markets, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Global Business Today 6eby Charles W.L. HillMcGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.Chapter 12Entering Foreign MarketsIntroduction Question: How can firms enter foreign markets?Firms can enter foreign markets throughexportinglicensing or franchising to host country firmsa joint venture with a host country firma wholly owned subsidiary in the host country to serve that market The advantages and disadvantages of each entry mode is determined bytransport costs and trade barrierspolitical and economic risksfirm strategyBasic Entry Decisions Question: What are the basic entry decisions for firms expanding internationally?A firm expanding internationally must decidewhich markets to enterwhen to enter them and on what scalehow to enter them (the choice of entry mode)Entry ModesQuestion: What is the best way to enter a foreign market?Firms can enter foreign market throughExportingTurnkey projectsLicensingFranchisingJoint ventures Wholly owned subsidiaries Each mode has advantages and disadvantages Selecting an Entry Mode Question: How should a firm choose a specific entry mode?All entry modes have advantages and disadvantagesThe optimal entry mode depends to some degree on the nature of a firm’s core competencies Core competencies can involvetechnological know-howmanagement know-howSelecting an Entry ModeFirms facing strong pressures for cost reductions are likely to pursue some combination of exporting and wholly owned subsidiariesThis will allow the firms to achieve location and scale economies as well as retain some degree of control over worldwide product manufacturing and distributionGreenfield or Acquisition? Question: Should a firm establish a wholly owned subsidiary in a country by building a subsidiary from the ground up (greenfield strategy), or by acquiring an established enterprise in the target market (acquisition strategy)? The number of cross border acquisitions are increasingOver the last decade, 50-80 percent of all FDI inflows have been mergers and acquisitionsGreenfield or Acquisition?Acquisitions are quick to executeenable firms to preempt their competitorscan be less risky than green-field venturesAcquisitions fail whenthe firm overpays for the assets of the acquired firmthere is a clash between the cultures of the acquiring and acquired firmattempts to realize synergies by integrating the operations of the acquired and acquiring entities run into roadblocks and take much longer than forecastthere is inadequate pre-acquisition screening Greenfield or Acquisition? Question: How can firms reduce the problems associated with acquisitions?Firms can reduce the problems associated with acquisitionsthrough careful screening of the firm to be acquiredby moving rapidly once the firm is acquired to implement an integration planGreenfield or Acquisition?Question: Why are greenfield ventures attractive?Greenfield ventures are attractive because they allow the firm to build the kind of subsidiary company that it wantsHowever, greenfield venturesare slower to establishare risky because they have no proven track recordcan be problematic if a competitor enters via acquisition and quickly builds market share